Episode
7
A
Revolutionary MP: Wolfie MacNeil
On July 22nd 2015 Angus MacNeil MP gave an interview to Energy Live News. Here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVmP47LVeTQ
This interview was given around 18 months prior to the MP becoming aware that gas customers in
Stornoway - his own constituents – could not benefit from his advice as they were
legally prevented from “switching”
suppliers by an amendment to the 1995
Gas Act.
What a gift for any left leaning MP – the hated private sector, assisted by Westminster Legislation, penalising
poor constituents - far less one
just itching to lead the parade of fellow Bravehearts
to the nearest International Court reception centre in order to lodge UDI papers on behalf of his beloved country.
To be fair, between 2017 and 2019 the MP did forward a number of detailed and thoroughly researched
letters (see below) to various recipients including: The CEO of British Gas, the Minister for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy and the chairman of OFGEM. Here, apparently, we had an MP determined to take on one of the
largest private companies on behalf of his constituents. Apparently.
From the redoubt upon which Angus MacNeil took his stand,
the Saltire in one hand, a throng of shivering
local pensioners huddled protectively behind, the bold Angus has, alas, simply
vanished.
It happened like this: As readers of Episode 2 will remember, on November 2nd 2018 British Gas’ outside
counsel Mr Philip Knight of Womble Bond
Dickinson (UK) LLP, at his client’s instruction, wrote
to Stornoway Sheriff Court to request the Sheriff excuse a British Gas
Executive Officer (Ms K White)
from having to comply with a Witness
Citation Notice because she was only a “…junior customer services manager…”.
Having been made aware of this description of a person who had written to him over
a year previously to advise that she, a Senior Customer Manager in British
Gas’ Executive Office would,
henceforth, be handling all enquiries from the MP and his constituents, Angus MacNeil MP immediately wrote to the then CEO of British Gas, Mark
Hodges, asking to be informed of Ms
White’s actual position as of
November 9 2018. Four days later he received a response not from Hodges, but
from Alexander Anderson, Deputy Head, Centrica Corporate Services. Previously Mr Anderson had been
employed as SNP Spokesperson in Westminster, Spokesperson
and Special Advisor for First
Minister Alex Salmond and Special Advisor
to First Minister Sturgeon. Here is
his email to Angus MacNeil:
Dear Angus
I refer to your letter of 9 November to Mark
Hodges - constituency case reference AM1660.
We are currently engaged in correspondence with
both Stornoway Sheriff Court and Mr McPherson (as representative) regarding the
position of Ms White in our business. As your letter raises issues which are
currently connected to live Court proceedings I am afraid that we are not in a
position to respond.
With best wishes meantime,
A.
It hardly
needs pointing out that neither was MS White’s job title an issue nor was
it connected to “live Court Proceedings.”
It was, simply, Senior Customer Manager in British
Gas’ Executive Office. What is of more interest, however, is how this
email ends: “With
best wishes meantime/A”. One can construe from
such that not only are the correspondents known to each other, there is a
measure of affection evident. What is certain, is that from receipt of that
email, Angus MacNeil would never again exhibit any enthusiasm for ensuring his
constituents were not disadvantaged by British
Gas’ business practices in the
largest town in his constituency.
His final email to me on the matter was in response to a
request for his assistance after British
Gas admitted, in court, to blatantly discriminating against every gas
customer in Stornoway by refusing to include them in its offers of “Goods and Services” due to their “Location”!
Here it is:
(July 29.
2018)
Hello Derek
I’ve spoken
to Angus re your below email and he said as it a legal matter perhaps a lawyer
could advise better than he can.
So there you have it. British Gas openly declaims it
discriminates against an entire Scottish town. And a town in the constituency
of the man who would be the bearer of our UDI
ticket to “Freedom”!!! Grazie Deo, Independence is not a “Legal
Matter”.
As any right thinking person will appreciate, I thought it
best not to seek further assistance from such a toothless Revolutionary. As of the 12th of this month, however,
when British Gas’s outside counsel
advised it was unable to “locate” a
consequential document it had produced and forwarded to Ombudsman Services: Energy sometime in 2016, I felt compelled to
email the MP asking him to request OFGEM reopen an enquiry it had closed
principally on the infallibility of British
Gas’ data retention system. I was not the only constituent to send an
email seeking the MP’s assistance on
this matter. He ignored those requests.
Having spoken with Gwen Harrison, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards regarding the MP’s refusal
to communicate, I was advised that the only thing to be done about an MP who refused to assist his/her
constituents was to vote for another candidate (and hope that enough others
would do so also) at the next electoral opportunity, I contacted a very senior SNP agent who urged me to “give Angus one more opportunity to carry out
his constituency duties.” I did. Here’s the email I forwarded to his
secretaries in both London and Stornoway last Friday:
Good
Morning
Yesterday
I was in communication with a very senior SNP figure who urged
me to contact you prior the making arrangements to serve Angus with a Witness Citation Notice in the
case of McPherson v British Gas Trading Limited (STO-SG12-19).
As
you should be aware, a new development in the "British Gas scandal"
in Stornoway has come to light: British Gas' "data retention system" upon
which OFGEM relied to find the 40+ constituents who had
complained to Angus that they had been refused access to British Gas' tariff,
had never in fact, made any such call and were being "untruthful" by
claiming they did. Every one of them! On the 12th of this month, however, British
Gas revealed that that its "data retention system" is not 100% reliable which, inter alia, must cast doubt on
the OFGEM Investigation findings. Given so, I, as one of
Angus' constituents, am formally requesting my MP contact OFGEM for
the purpose of requiring that ALB organisation
reopen its Investigation into the claim that British Gas withheld
its Sainsbury's tariff
from his constituents. Failure to do so, I can assure you, will see Angus
served a Witness Citation Notice as
soon as a trial date for the above proceeding has been assigned.
It
is, I assure you, my genuine hope that Angus comes to his senses, attends to
his duties as a constituency MP and acts accordingly on behalf
of his constituents in this matter. If he opts not to do so, I can guarantee
his experience in the witness box at Stornoway Sheriff Court -
should he deviate by so much as an inch from the position he
represented in his many
letters to British Gas, OFGEM, BEIS etc etc - will
not be something he, or his Party, will look back on fondly.
In
conclusion, I wish to make it clear beyond dispute, this email constitutes a
final, and desperate attempt to have an MP (whom I voted for)
take a stance against a giant private company which disadvantaged his
constituents. Should he refuse to assist, thereby forcing me to ensure his
appearance in the witness box at Stornoway Sheriff Court, I will,
albeit reluctantly, question him with the same fortitude and intensity he
promised to exhibit on behalf his constituents, only last December.
Assuredly,
Derek McPherson.
Assuredly or not our MP, of whom the Daily Record
once asked “Is Western Isles MP Angus MacNeil Scotland’s Sleaziest Politician” (18 May 2016), has not yet answered. But
he will. And he’ll do so in advance of leading “his people” to that Valhalla
of Independence. Assuredly.
Below are a couple of examples of the letters Angus
MacNeil was sending prior to the “Anderson
Email.” Both reveal an MP eager
to ensure his constituents are treated fairly by British Gas. Although, both went largely unanswered!
(July 2018)
Mr Mark
Hodges
CEO
Centrica plc
Dear Mr
Hodges
On
Thursday of last week in response to my question, “…how “heavily” does Centrica subsidise the transportation
of propane gas to Stornoway?” your colleague, Ms Kathy White, informed me:
“…we’re [Centrica] not directly responsible for the
transportation of gas.”
I
understand that Centrica is not
involved in the transportation of gas to my constituency town of Stornoway at
all and has, therefore, no financial exposure to the subsidising of its
transportation. The responsibility for transportation of gas to Stornoway, lies
with Ofgem and the costs of such are
met by a levy on every unit of gas used in the UK.
Given the above, I would appreciate an
explanation as to why Ms White forwarded the following representation to one of
my constituents on June 8, last year:
“While
Stornoway is theoretically open to competition, the high cost of supplying gas
means that, in practice, other suppliers do not choose to supply.”
This is
not the only example I am aware of. In 2013, another of your colleagues, Ms X
forwarded the following to another of my constituents:
“…if the market
were opened up in Stornoway for other energy companies to be able to supply
your energy – would other energy companies be forthcoming in supplying the area
in which you live at a loss?”
This
too, since there would be no cost (or loss) whatsoever to “other energy companies”, was I believe incorrect.
Given the above, I am formally requesting you
instigate a review of all communications with all my constituents who have been
denied access to your Sainsbury’s Energy tariff, from 2015 to 2017, by Centrica agents informing them, “Sainsbury’s does not supply gas to
Stornoway”.
Further,
please confirm how many of my constituents in addition to those cited above,
were falsely informed, in writing, that Centrica
subsidises the transportation of gas to Stornoway.
Given
that the Minister for State at the Department for Business, Energy and
Industrial Strategy is aware of this matter I would appreciate a speedy
response to this letter.
Yours
sincerely
Angus B MacNeil MP
(Dec 2017)
Ryan
McFadden
External
Relations and Media Manager
Ofgem
Dear Mr McFadden
Thank you for your email in which you
anticipate my finding the "couple of points that are not in our
letter" interesting. As a matter of record, I find the points to which you
refer, disturbing.
You apprise me that the missing
information was the result of the call being "...blind transferred from
one agent to another without following the correct transfer process...".:
The fact that the missing information was voiced by the same agent who, on the
original and complete recording, simply continued speaking is evidence enough
that the missing information in not explicable by
"call-transference". Indeed, on the original recording, the only
break in the agent's communication was at the end of a completed sentence which
clearly offered an opportunity for the nefarious termination of the recording.
Further, you do not comment on the missing information itself, which was,
contrary to both Centrica/Scottish Gas' statutory obligations as well as to its
assurances, provided to your office last December that its Stornoway customers
were, and always had been, able to access the Sainsbury's deal. The missing
information (on the original recording) included a specific and unambiguous
assurance by the aforementioned agent that "Sainsbury's Energy" only
began "delivering Propane gas to Stornoway on March 31, this year"
which is a clear contradiction of the assurances given to your organisation
some five months previously. I will be grateful, then, for an assurance that
Ofgem will, without any undue delay, investigate this matter rigorously and
apprise me of its findings along with any proposed measures it intends taking
to ensure this company complies with its statutory obligations in my
constituency.
Regarding the excuse for the
"missing details" on Mr McPherson's "copies of bills": Mr
McPherson never "demanded" a copy of his bills from Scottish Gas at
any time. Mr McPherson did, however, make a number of requests, both orally and
severally in writing, for "Holograph" copies of said bills. Further,
of all "copies" received by Mr McPherson, it was only the bill which
highlighted the Sainsbury's Energy Dual Fuel tariff savings which had had
information "removed". I might add, the notion of "Scottish
Gas...investigating options that will allow them to automatically generate copies
of bills with the original CTM..." sounds disturbingly similar to the
advice proffered to, Mr McPherson in November of last year whereby he was told,
in response to his complaint that he was being denied access to the Sainsbury’s
Dual Fuel tariff which was advertised on the front page of his bill, that
Centrica/Scottish Gas would, "...make sure these issues are looked into
and updated so it [the Sainsbury's offer] doesn't appear on customers bill that
have piped propane supply." Not, you will notice; Centrica/Scottish Gas
will "...immediately begin to adhere to the law..." If you require
corroboration/proof of any of the above, please let me know immediately.
Otherwise, please attend to points I have raised and apprise me of Ofgem's
response as a matter of urgency.
Yours sincerely
Angus B MacNeil MP.
Roll on Independence under Angus. And to those naysayers who
declare Independence will lead to Scotland becoming a ”Banana Republic”,
I say this: We don’t have the climate.
I just read that Daily Record piece, what ever happened to us being represented by MP's who were of the highest moral calibre? How can we expect to be treated fairly by our MP if he can't treat his nearest and dearest well.!
ReplyDeleteHis ex-nearest and dearest, I think you'll find.
DeleteI don't think the MP has really thought this Independence matter through. If as the newspaper headlines state, he is a love rat, then London is the sewer and he'd have no reason to spend any time there having freed his people here!!!
ReplyDeleteThe MP for the Western Isles appears to have no loyalty to anyone except himself: neither constituents nor family. He seems more interested in the perks that an MP'S salary and expenses brings.
ReplyDeleteGiven his recent lack of commitment to representing his constituents against British Gas, could he possibly have been got at?
"Appears" Madam? Nay, it is. MacNeil's idea of public service is more like a normal person's idea of self-service. And everyone knows it! His Party's senior agents know it. The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards knows it (I told her) and his constituents here in Stornoway most certainly know it. "Could he possibly have been got at?" Anything's possible, but why would someone as disinterested in his duties as this character need to be "got at" anyhow?
DeleteBecause he was obviously very interested when he wrote the letters published in this blog. These were not letters written by a 'disinterested character.' and if senior SNP agents are aware of the MP's newly discovered apathy, what are they doing about it?
DeleteNothing is the short answer to your question. As to the letters being written by a "disinterested character", clearly were not. The fact is, I'm afraid, if elected SNP politicians decide not to assist their constituents, that is a decision without consequence. Only yesterday I was contacted by a local resident (A real one who lives in Stornoway rather than an 800 lb impostor living hundreds of miles from here) who assures me this behaviour is widespread among SNP parliamentarians: He is one of a number of citizens who, despite, begging the Scottish Government to investigate a horrific child-abuse matter connected to a Scottish football club, are having their entreaties completely ignored.
DeleteYesterday the MP finally responded to my email asking him to get OFGEM to reopen it's enquiry after this Blog revealed its inability to retrieve data with 100% reliability. He said: 'I cannot raise this again with OFGEM.'
ReplyDeleteWhat? He said, IN WRITING "I cannot raise this with OFGEM"! What is wrong with this patriotic Braveheart who is so determined to tear us free all from the shackles of the Westminster Parliament that he is willing to sacrifice over £250.000 annually to do so? Something most certainly is! When a man of such conviction and belief "cannot" request OFGEM reopen an Investigation based on important new evidence something is seriously amiss. Remember this MR MP, OFGEM concluded that all of the constituents who informed you that they had called British Gas to ask to "switch" to its Sainsbury's deal had not done so (HAD LIED!). It came to this conclusion because British Gas could find no record of any of them calling. Well now that it is clear British Gas' "data retention system" is "inaccurate" it is time for you to get into a real fight - as opposed to your imbecilic notion of declaring UDI - in order to defend the integrity of the honest and decent people who told you they'd been refused a particular tariff from British Gas.
DeleteHere's the long and the short of it: There is absolutely nothing stopping you from asking OFGEM to reopen its Investigation into the claim that they were denied access to a British Gas tariff. Unless, of course, its a lack of cojones
The vey idea of Independence is built upon the desire to release the people from exploitation. Come on Angus, demand the reopening of the investigation!
ReplyDeleteSo British Gas says 'we can find no record of your constituents calling' which means they didn't call and that they were lying when they said they did? That should be enough for any decent MP to read the Riot Act. But when it cannot find a document it claims to have produced and sent to the Ombudsman, no big deal??? The MP should be demanding the Police open an Investigation, not the organisation which pays for British Gas' product to be transported to this island!!!!
ReplyDeleteYou're both absolutely right, but so far as this MP is concerned, you're just making noise. He'll happily storm the barricades (in his adolescent imagination) to "Free his People" from the horror of being governed from London. But his constituents being called a bunch of liars by a private company based in London? Nothing to do with me Gov! Nothing at all. What a fantastic "Representative". I don't believe.
DeleteIf you'd rather accept OFGEM calling his constituants a bunch of liars than asking it to reopen its investigation into a company which can "lose" incriminating data, why not start a petition to make him request OFGEM reopen the investigation? You could then send the results to the MP. And the media. And the labour party. And the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards etc etc. Maybe that would get his attention!
ReplyDelete